In Defense Of The Arrests At The Reflecting Pool

The coating is peeling because vandals cut a 250-foot gash in it and poured corrosive chemicals into the water. The confirmed vandals include a 67-year-old Olympic canoeist who touched the existing damage to see what it felt like, and a television reporter who pulled a floating piece of coating out of the pool on camera. The pool will be drained again. A doyourownresearch.lol Public Works follow-up, filed June 22, 2026.

When our Public Works Desk filed its analysis two days ago, the situation at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was as follows: a $14.65 million no-bid contract had been awarded to a pool company the President trusted, the pool had been painted American flag blue, the water had turned fluorescent green from an algae bloom, the blue coating had begun peeling from the floor in large sheets, and the President had identified the responsible party as vandals. We called every step of this defensible. We stand by that.

We did not anticipate how quickly the vandals would be caught.

On Saturday, June 21, President Trump announced on Truth Social that United States Park Police had made "multiple arrests" of individuals he described as having deliberately sabotaged the reflecting pool. As of Saturday evening, five people had been arrested and five others had been issued citations. The President was specific about what these individuals had done to the pool's new surface, which Atlantic Industrial Coatings had applied at a cost that grew from an initial estimate of $1.8 million to approximately $14.65 million over six weeks of urgent work.

"They took some form of knife or blade, and put a 250 foot long gash into the beautiful facade... they also poured corrosive and destructive chemicals into the Pool." — Donald Trump, Truth Social, June 21, 2026, identifying the cause of the damage to the reflecting pool's new blue coating and the algae bloom in the water

This is an important statement. The coating is peeling because someone cut a 250-foot gash in it with a knife. The water turned green because someone poured corrosive chemicals into it. The President has identified the mechanism. The press has a different theory. The press always has a different theory.

The Olympic Canoeist

Among the five people arrested in connection with the vandalism was David Hearn, 67, a Bethesda, Maryland man and three-time United States Olympic canoeist who competed in canoe slalom. According to his own account, multiple witnesses, and news cameras that were recording at the time, Hearn walked up to the reflecting pool, reached down into the water, and touched a piece of the already-detached blue coating to see what it felt like. He then walked away. The United States Park Police arrested him. He was held for approximately five hours before being released.

The charge was misdemeanor destruction of government property.

Hearn subsequently issued the following statement:

"I did not remove, I did not damage, I did not rip, tear, break, destroy or harm any part of the Reflecting Pool." — David Hearn, statement to media following his release, June 2026

I want to be careful here, because accuracy is the Public Works Desk's first obligation. What the President said is that a knife was used to cut a 250-foot gash into the coating. What the Park Police charged is that Hearn committed misdemeanor destruction of government property. What Hearn said is that he touched a piece of coating that was already detached, confirmed it felt like what it looked like, and left without removing anything. These are three accounts. Two of them agree that damage occurred. And one of them involves a three-time Olympian who is now legally responsible for the state of a pool that was peeling before he arrived.

I do not think these facts are in conflict. A person who touches existing damage is, by touching it, engaging with the damage. Engagement with damage is adjacent to damage. The Park Police have drawn the appropriate legal conclusion. In a 250-foot crime scene, you cast a wide net.

They will say: "The coating was already peeling before Hearn reached the pool. He touched a piece that was floating, already detached, already separated from the floor without his involvement. Charging him with destruction of government property for touching damage that preceded him is not law enforcement. It is blame management." — This is technically accurate. But "technically accurate" is exactly the kind of language that vandals use to describe their actions after the fact. Did David Hearn cut a 250-foot gash in the facade? He did not. Was David Hearn present at a pool that the President says has a 250-foot gash in its facade? He was. The legal system will sort out the rest, as it always does.

The Jonathan Karl Question

The President also addressed, on Truth Social, an incident involving Jonathan Karl, the ABC News reporter. The President wrote that Karl was "seen sticking his hand into the Pool, and trying to rip the rubber off of the surface."

What occurred is this: on Thursday, June 19, Karl reported from the reflecting pool for ABC News. During his report, he reached into the water and retrieved what appeared to be a piece of the blue coating that was already floating near the surface. He showed it to the camera and described what he was holding. He identified it as a piece of the detached liner. He then continued his broadcast.

The President's characterization of this as "trying to rip the rubber off of the surface" is the President's characterization. I would not characterize it differently. A man reaches into a pool. A man removes something from a pool. Whether he removed it from the surface of the water or from the surface of the floor is a question of depth and prepositions that the relevant authorities may eventually clarify. What is not in dispute is that Karl was there, his hand was in the water, and something came out of the water in his hand. The President believes this constitutes vandalism. Karl believes he was demonstrating that the pool was coming apart. Only one of these men is the President.

They will say: "The piece Karl retrieved was floating freely at the surface. It had already detached from the floor, and the pool was losing material with or without his intervention. What he did on camera was show viewers evidence of a product failure, not cause one. He is a reporter doing his job." — And yet the question is not what Karl believed he was doing. The question is what the pool looked like when he arrived and what it looked like when he left. The pool looked like a pool that was falling apart both times. The President has drawn the relevant conclusion, and the President has access to facts the press does not.

The Chemistry, Revisited

At this point I should address the hydrogen peroxide.

On June 17, National Park Service workers were photographed pouring hydrogen peroxide into the reflecting pool to treat the algae bloom. Scientists who study pool chemistry have noted, in subsequent reporting, that hydrogen peroxide is an active ingredient in certain paint-removal formulations. A paper by Polish chemical engineers identified hydrogen peroxide as a compound capable of degrading some coating adhesives. The algae, scientists further noted, was from the genus Desmodesmus, a bloom that is common in shallow, sun-exposed water and that may have been accelerated by the renovation's disturbance of the pool's existing nutrient balance.

The press has attempted to use these facts to suggest the peeling was caused by the National Park Service's own chemical treatment rather than by vandals. Their theory is: the National Park Service poured hydrogen peroxide into the pool, hydrogen peroxide can strip paint, the paint then stripped. This is their theory. They present it as though it forecloses the vandalism explanation.

It does not.

First, hydrogen peroxide is also used to clean wounds. It is available at every pharmacy in America. If it were a corrosive and destructive chemical capable of dissolving a $14.65 million industrial coating, it would not be shelved between the bandages and the aspirin. Its presence at the pool is therefore exculpatory, not incriminating. It tells us the Park Service was attempting to heal the pool, which is precisely what you do when vandals have attacked it.

Second, the President said corrosive chemicals were poured into the pool by vandals. The National Park Service poured chemicals into the pool. These two facts are consistent with each other. Whether the Park Service workers are among the vandals, or whether unidentified vandals poured chemicals separately and the Park Service subsequently responded with their own chemicals, is a matter for the investigation, which remains ongoing. The President named no specific Park Service employees in his Truth Social post. He left the universe of suspects appropriately open.

Third, the algae is "75% gone," per the President, who drove across the pool personally to confirm its condition. He has first-hand knowledge of the algae situation. The scientists who identified Desmodesmus as a natural bloom common in shallow water did not drive across the pool. The President did.

The pool was treated with hydrogen peroxide.
The pool's new coating began peeling.
Scientists say hydrogen peroxide can strip paint.
The President says vandals poured corrosive chemicals.
The National Park Service poured chemicals.
These facts are not inconsistent with each other.
The investigation is ongoing.

The Pool Will Be Drained Again

President Trump confirmed on Truth Social that the pool will need to be drained again and that repairs will begin "immediately" following the arrests. Eddie Wood, the owner of Atlantic Industrial Coatings, acknowledged to reporters that "there are several things that need to be addressed when they come back for maintenance."

I want to be precise about what this means, because precision is the Public Works Desk's obligation to its readers. The pool was drained in April 2026. It was painted at a cost that grew from $1.8 million to approximately $14.65 million over roughly six weeks. It was refilled in early June 2026. The coating was described as industrial-grade and expected to last forty to fifty years. The water turned green within days. The coating began peeling. The pool will now be drained again, repainted, and refilled at a cost that has not yet been announced, for a renovation that lasted approximately sixteen days in its current state before requiring emergency vandalism-remediation.

I want to address the framing that this is a "cost overrun" or a "failure." A cost overrun implies a planning error. This is a crime scene remediation. The cost of repairing a crime is the criminal's cost, not the government's. When the vandals are fully identified, prosecuted, and ordered to pay restitution, the figures will resolve themselves. Until then, any additional expenditure attached to "draining the pool again" is the vandals' liability, and I decline to add it to the procurement ledger of a project that was, up until the moment the vandals arrived, going extremely well.

REFLECTING POOL — UPDATE LEDGER (as of June 22, 2026) ------------------------------------------------------ Days since our original analysis: ......... 2 Days coating lasted before remediation: ... ~16 Warranty claimed at project launch: ....... 40-50 years Arrests made (as of June 21): ............. 5 Citations issued: .......................... 5 Notable arrestee: .......................... David Hearn, 3x US Olympian Hearn's documented act: ................... Touched already-detached coating Hours Hearn held in custody: .............. ~5 Hearn's self-reported damage to pool: ..... Zero 250-foot gash (per President): ............. Confirmed (per President) Gash as % of pool's 2,028-foot length: .... 12.3% Chemicals poured (per President): .......... Corrosive. Destructive. Chemicals poured (per NPS records): ....... Hydrogen peroxide (June 17) H2O2 availability: ......................... Every pharmacy, ~$2.99 Algae species: ............................. Desmodesmus (not toxic) Algae status (per President): .............. 75% gone Reporter charged: .......................... None (Jonathan Karl, ABC News) Reason Karl not charged: ................... Under investigation, presumably Cost of second drain: ...................... To be determined (vandals' cost) Current pool color: ........................ Transitional Target pool color: ......................... American Flag Blue Responsible party: ......................... Vandals (incl. Olympic canoeist)

The updated doctrine, stated plainly:

The Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was painted American flag blue at a cost of approximately $14.65 million. The coating lasted sixteen days. The water turned fluorescent green from a Desmodesmus algae bloom that scientists say is common in shallow, sun-exposed water and may have been accelerated by the renovation disturbing the pool's nutrient balance. The coating peeled from the floor in large sheets, likely because the National Park Service poured hydrogen peroxide into the pool to treat the algae, and hydrogen peroxide is an active ingredient in some paint removers, which the President identifies as evidence that corrosive chemicals were poured by vandals, which is consistent with the documented record of chemicals being poured. Law enforcement arrested five people, including David Hearn, a 67-year-old three-time Olympic canoeist who reached into the pool and touched a floating piece of existing detached coating to see what it felt like, and subsequently stated he had not damaged anything. ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl retrieved a floating piece of the coating on camera during a live report; the President characterized this as Karl "trying to rip the rubber off of the surface." The pool will be drained again and repairs will begin immediately. The owner of Atlantic Industrial Coatings says there are things to address for maintenance. The cost of the second drain has not been announced. The President says the algae is 75% gone and an Olympic canoeist spent five hours in custody for touching a pool that his own government's hydrogen peroxide had been dissolving for four days. The vandals have been identified. The pool will be blue again. Do not touch the pool.